Electronics tax

APPLiA, together with other industry associations, is conducting intensive advocacy work regarding the current Electronics Tax (LSKE), also called the Chemicals Tax. Here you will find current material in the debate. 

Our policy

  • Unilateral national taxation is not the right method to speed up the substitution of the current flame retardants as products with electronic content are standardized for sale in all EU countries. The EU's RoHS directive should instead be used as a tool for this to be effective.
  • Swedish companies operate in a global market – The electronics tax de facto provides a substantial competitive advantage for foreign players, who sell to Swedish consumers to an increasing extent – as these are completely exempt from chemicals tax, which in the long run reduces tax revenues and the number of jobs in Sweden, without benefiting the environment since the imported products still contain the chemicals.
  • The administrative burden of the electronics tax is unreasonable for companies and difficult to control by the authorities – there are still no testing methods to check the content of the products, which makes it difficult for all parties involved to ensure that the correct tax is paid and that competition is not being undermined.
  • The design of the electronics tax – collection for the total weight of the product / without regard to the amount of the substances contained – makes the tax unevenly and unfairly distributed between industries.
  • APPLiA is pursuing the issue of changes to the Electronics Tax and inclusion in RoHS for brominated flame retardants in consultation with the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, the Swedish Technology Companies and the Swedish Trade Association.
Immerse yourself in the Electronics Tax and its effects together with Robert Lönn, tax lawyer at the Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.

Read more

More news about the electronics tax >>